Sunday, October 30, 2005

Ben Bernanke as the new Fed Chairman

Business Week ( issue dated Nov 7th 2005 ) ran a pretty interesting article about Ben Bernanke. It can be accessed online with a subscription at http://www.businessweek.com.The article has a table comparing the economic situation in 1987 when Greenspan took over as Fed Chairman compared to 2005 which would be Greenspan's last year as fed chairman. It says that things are better now compared to what it was in 1987. The interesting stat is that real stock market value adjusted for inflation has more than doubled in this time frame. The real wages have gained only 6% compared to 1987.There is another article in page 30 with a theme that Fed's power has shrunk and it no longer is the force it used to be. The main points for this argument are that there is more international financial flow now compared to 87 and that the foreign stock markets are more mature giving investment alternatives for foreign cash.

The article does miss some key points though. First of all, the situation is no less challenging than it was in 87, in some cases it is more challenging than was the case then. The U.S is already importing goods and services close to 7% of GDP this year. The surplus dollars have to come home - sooner or later thus financing the current account deficit.

The fed still has plenty of power - the global economy is still largely dependent on the U.S consumer. Slow down in the U.S is going to impact all the industries in Canada/Mexico, Europe and Asia. Fed can raise short term interest rates and can cause cooling of the housing market and put breaks on the consumer. Long term rates are partly dependent on the short term rates.

The buttonwood column in the economist also talks of some of the risks to the U.S dollar and the downward trend to resume starting next year. The link to that article is in http://www.economist.com/agenda/displaystory.cfm?story_id=5078354. Given the expected rise of prices in FY06 where firms will start to pass the higher cost of raw materials to consumers, the fed chairman job is anything but easy. The unpredictable international capital flow makes the task of setting the all important interest rates even harder.
Microsoft reported the FY06 first quarter earnings on Oct 27, 2005. The details of the report can be found at the Microsoft web site.

http://www.microsoft.com/msft/earnings/FY06/earn_rel_q1_06.mspx

Some interesting tid-bits from the earnings

Total revenue increased by 6%. Diluted earnings per share increased by 26%. Where does the increase come from?

The cost of revenue, and spending on R&D, general, administritative has come down. The marketing costs are up by 281 million dollars compared to the same quarter last year. Overall cost is at the same level as last year, thus producing a gain of 15.8% compared to last year. Investment income is up by 229 million dollars. Considering this, earnings are up 24.2%. The rest of the earnings come from the reduced number of outstanding shares - which reduced by 148 million compared to the year ago quarter.

Revenues of different units went up as follows:

client - 7%
server and tools - 12%
information worker - 4%
msn - 1%
mobile devices - 51%
home and entertainment - -17% ( new xbox in the pipeline )
microsoft business solutions - 16%

Total operating income increased by 15.8% - which can mainly be attributed to cost cutting. The rest of the income came by increased investment gains and reduced number of outstanding shares.